A dying breed?
Photo via Wikimedia Commons
A couple of days ago, I looked at draft pick origins by league. The most significant conclusion from that article concerned Eastern Europe:
The most obvious takeaway from the data is the slump from Eastern European leagues. In 2003 and 2004, leagues in Belarus, The Czech Republic, Latvia, Poland, Russia, and Slovakia accounted for 19% of all picks. In 2011 and 2012 those same leagues accounted for just 5% and 4% of all picks. In fact, since 2007, those leagues haven’t combined for more than 5% of all selections.
One possible explanation raised by commenters, is that the distribution of picks by nationality hasn’t changed, rather the reason for the shift in league distribution is the sheer amount of imports playing junior hockey in Canada.
I sorted the data by birth country and found that explanation doesn’t hold water either.
- From 2003 – 2005, picks from Eastern European countries (Belarus, The Czech Republic, Latvia, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia) accounted for an average of 20% of the draft. From 2010 – 2012, those same countries accounted for 9% of the draft. But even that isn’t the full story. In 2003 and 2004, Eastern Europe picks accounted for 22% of the draft. In 2005, that dropped to 14% followed by 14% again in 2006, but since then, those countries haven’t been above 10%. Even including CHL and USHL imports, Eastern Europe has lost half of their draft “share”, meaning on average, 27 less kids are being drafted from those countries each year.
- Another significant trend is the fall-off in Quebec-born draft picks. Though the QMJHL’s raw numbers have remained constant (11% to 10% in ten years), they’re actually being held constant by imports, not native-born players. Quebec-born players have accounted for just 5% of picks over the last three years versus 8% from 2003-2005. While it seems insignificant, It’s an average of 6 fewer Québécois drafted each year. At the same time, the Maritimes have experienced a 50% drop, from 7 picks per year to just over 3.
- The slack has been picked up by three primary sources: Sweden, The United States and Ontario. Sweden’s share has risen from 7% to 11% (8 extra kids per year), The United States’ share has risen from 21% to 28% (14 extra kids per year), and Ontario’s share has risen from 14% to 19% (11 extra kids per year).
Aside from the bump in the U.S. share, the explanations here aren’t easy. Why has the Eastern European share collapsed? What’s going on with Quebec-born kids? Is Sweden seeing an actual rise in talent level, or is scouting better? And are GM’s and scouts going with the safe alternative in Ontario-born kids?
Let us know what you think in the comments.